Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Images
  5. Kernel 4.4.x

Kernel 4.4.x

Angeheftet Images

  • FrankMF

    RockPro64 - Mainline Kernel 5.9.x vom Kamil

    Images
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    411 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Hoppla, nach langer Zeit mal was Neues vom Kamil.

    5.9.0-1146-ayufan released

    WIP: cdn_dp hdmi audio switch
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - PCIe NVMe SSD installieren

    Hardware
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    293 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • W

    NVMe SSD Speed auf Kernel 5.0 von Kamil

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    11
    0 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    866 Aufrufe
    W

    @FrankM sagte in NVMe SSD Speed auf Kernel 5.0 von Kamil:

    Kurz was zum Nanopc-t4, das war das Board, wo ich damals schon geschrieben habe, wie man da die Wärme weg bekommt!? Ok, bleiben wir beim ROCKPro64 😉

    Hmm .. nix dazu im Forum bei dir gefunden .. nach wärme , nano usw. gesucht ..

    Den Teil verstehe ich nicht. Woher soll er denn das 0.7er Image laden???

    Von seiner SD .. ein bisschen wirr von mir beschrieben.

    Nackter Rockpro, ohne USB-Devices, ohne NVMe, ohne emmc, ..

    Ablauf 1:
    SD Karte mit 0.7er Image (das bisher immer funktioniert hatte) rein -> Rockpro geht an, beide LEDs gehen an (was aber bisher nur die weisse war), kein weiterer Boot-Vorgang.

    Ablauf 2:
    SD Karte mit 0.8er Image (gleiche SD Karte) rein -> Rockpro geht an, perfekter Boot Vorgang.

    Das Monitor "Problem" und das 0.7er scheinen hier ggf. zusammen zu hängen, jedoch - mehr debugging nur mit der RS232 möglich, ggf. Mist im First-Stage-Loader ..

    (Erase SPI , etc. alles hatte nichts verändert ..)

    Wenn jemand richtig Zeit und Lust hätte könnte man sich ja am Armbian nand-sata Script orientieren:

    Da habe ich auch schon mal drüber nachgedacht....

    Ich würde 5$ Patreon Money dazu geben 🙂

    Einen schönen Sonntag.

  • FrankMF

    Mainline Kernel 5.0.x

    Images
    11
    0 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    870 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    5.0.0-1105-ayufan released

    ayufan: dts: rockpro64: enable sdio0
  • W

    VON USB 4TB HD BOOTEN GEHT NICHT

    ROCKPro64
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    566 Aufrufe
    W

    Hallo FrankM,
    schade das Du mir nicht weiter helfen kannst, aber danke für Deine schnelle Antwort.
    Mit dem Bugreport kenne ich nicht aus, bin noch leihe.

    Einen schönen Abend noch.

    Winne

  • FrankMF

    Mainline Kernel 4.17-rc7

    Verschoben Archiv
    8
    0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    4.17.0-rc6-1029-ayufan released

    Link Preview Image Releases · ayufan-rock64/linux-mainline-kernel

    Linux kernel source tree. Contribute to ayufan-rock64/linux-mainline-kernel development by creating an account on GitHub.

    favicon

    GitHub (github.com)

    Seit 1021 funktioniert USB3.

  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    989 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    Images 0.6.x

    Verschoben Images
    30
    0 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    0.6.60 released

    0.6.60: Fix pcie/nvme/sata support for 4.4, 0.6.60: Fix spi-flash access for 4.4/mainline,

    Ich bin davon ausgegangen, das 0.6.x nict mehr fortgeführt wird, okay - sieht nicht so aus.

    Sollte released werden, ist aber aus irgendeinem Grund gestern nicht passiert (lt. Kamil)